What action should the IEP team take if a decision conflicts with a parent's preference according to the Endrew case?

• A. Overrule the parent's preference without explanation.
• B. Ignore the parent's input and finalize the decision.
• C. Automatically adopt the parent's preference.
• D. Provide a written report explaining their decision and include data.

Answer: (D)

In the context of the Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District case, the correct action for the IEP team, when faced with a decision that conflicts with a parent's preference, is to provide a written report explaining their decision and including relevant data.

This approach is rooted in the legal framework of special education which emphasizes collaboration and transparency between schools and families. The case underscored the importance of ensuring that the educational decisions made for students with disabilities are not only based on academic criteria but also in consideration of the child's unique needs. By documenting the rationale for decisions and backing them with data, the IEP team demonstrates to the parents that they are taking their concerns seriously while also adhering to legal standards for providing a Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE).

This practice fosters an environment of communication and respect, helping to maintain trust between educators and parents while ensuring that decisions are anchored in educational evidence and geared towards the best interest of the child.