Which statement represents a legal requirement for multi-disciplinary evaluation?

• A. Individual strengths and challenges must be considered.
• B. Data must be gathered over a period of no fewer than 50 days.
• C. The school principal must organize and lead collaboration.
• D. Assessment results must be approved by a majority of the team.

Answer: (A)

The statement that individual strengths and challenges must be considered reflects a fundamental legal requirement for multi-disciplinary evaluation within special education. This principle is rooted in the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), which emphasizes the need for a comprehensive understanding of a student’s unique profile. Legitimately assessing both strengths and challenges ensures that evaluations are holistic and focused on identifying appropriate supports and interventions. By acknowledging a student's capabilities alongside areas where they may need assistance, the evaluation process aligns with the goal of fostering educational growth and development tailored to individual needs.

In contrast, the other statements either do not align with specific legal mandates or represent aspects that are not universally required. For instance, the requirement for data collection over a period of 50 days lacks specificity in the context of IDEA guidelines. The role of the school principal regarding collaboration may vary by district policies and does not constitute a legal requirement. Lastly, the approval of assessment results by a majority of the team does not reflect the legal framework governing evaluations, as it is not stipulated that a majority vote is necessary for validation in special education assessments.